Abortion
I saw Elon Musk coming up with a theory on Our God, the God of the Jews, being black yesterday, so that now they want to say Our God could be black, yet they would never admit on their own, without women taking over, that there was at least a God and a Goddess during creation and they are Elohim, so at least 'gods' (as for what the men are willing to admit by now, as we saw on a YouTube here, perhaps in the blog Religion), not a single god. We have already proven that the most logical thing is that they were a spaceship and projected the image of one of their many gods around it so that Adam would see his own image in the sky.
We now found the above link (beginning of the post), where it clearly says that the baby only starts breathing after it is out of the belly of the mother. Yet, the Bible says the man (and only the man because the terrorists who made the Bible eliminated the superiority and appeareance of women all the way) becomes a Living Soul after God breaths inside of his nostrils, when he then starts to breath, obviously and trivially. The only argument the Catholic Church could have against abortion is that the commandment says, Do Not Kill. Yet, not only Jesus asked us to kill people, but he asked us to do that in front of him:"In the gospel of Luke, Jesus says, “But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them—bring them here and kill them in front of me.” (https://www.str.org/w/did-jesus-demand-we-kill-his-enemies-) In the same way that we then stopped stonning women for promiscuity (Jesus said it), we should then eliminate the command Do Not Kill from our list. Then we did, since places like the USA (oh, those holy people of mine) have death penalty, so death given by the own State as punishment (if there is life after death, and even the Bible says so, and if the spiritists are right and there is punishment there, we are all better that way. Now however we have alternative to jail and death penalty: this bug, which will be made wonderful after our Marcia Hope).
So, the only argument the Catholic Church could have would be the commandment and the soul: that the baby has a soul while inside of the belly. Now, as we see on the website in the beginning of the post, we KNOW better: no soul before that. I notice that men always created a new philosophy each time they felt like doing something the vast majority wouldn't accept were done to human kind: Islam, dictatorship and Nazism are just the easiest examples. Women can then now come up with a better religious theory: we can say babies are natural parasites of the woman's body and they grow like the worms do, inflating our bodies from acting like a pest, devouring our food each time in larger amounts, and causing us each time more inconvenience. However they become less and less of a pest as the husband increases his displays of gratitude to the pains and aches his wife endures for them both, so to the sacrifices the woman goes through to help them both perpetuate the memory of their love, of the union of the matter that God made represent their individual souls: caressing her belly, giving her more and more love, having sex while she is pregnant, finding special positions and ways to do it, making her wishes come true, making her company and so on, so perhaps like Tom Cruise, accompanying the baby at every moment and way, even while it is inside of the belly, already training for when it is out.
On the other hand, the woman who does not have that loving partner will experience the equivalent to a demoniac possession, since the baby will become more and more angry from not feeling welcome, without a loving couple to give it attention, so that getting rid of it is not only allowed, but recommended. The soul does not need to go to another body, since it is not in it yet, so that the woman can abort any time during the pregnancy and God will not only forgive but bless it: she saved one more soul from incarnating in a cursed body (a baby who does not have at least a mother and a father to give it attention, pay its bills, feed it and so on will unavoidably have disease, break bones, suffer other injuries and so on).
Worth mentioning that if the woman doesn't want to marry the father of the baby, we are in the same situation as in the above paragraph, so that the male cannot simply impose the mentioned attention to the woman to save the baby, even because the baby knows if the mother is happy or not, it feels from inside of her, like God feels us through the Holy Ghost every fraction of second of our lives: that will make God give a tormented soul for that body if the baby is ever born and that will bring many social problems, so that not only God but society should not want that babies of this type be born.
Let's take the opportunity to mention how satanic the men have been with women also in what regards other aspects of the human sexual life: the Catholic Church still doesn't accept contraceptives, so that the world still condemns those in many ways (in Australia, they obliged me to go through pregnancy exams when I said I had no sex at all, this just to give me a PRESCRIPTION for a PILL), and Catholic couples are then obliged to make use of the 'temperature method' when having sex if they don't want to become pregnant (Jee!). Men can get a condom anywhere on earth any time of the day without any prescription, so how come? Not only should the pill be given at the counter without any prescription to any woman who asks for it at any time but the Catholic Church needs to be seriously prosecuted for causing problems in the entire world for lots of people, including loving/God's couples. Yet, before we prosecute them, let's please prosecute Islam for crimes against humanity (1,500 years of legal slavery over women, God knows how many millions of women, 18 million only in Saudi Arabia), so perhaps let's prosecute Islam after finishing with their philosophy through what we published here, on our blog.
Comments
Post a Comment