Egypt: Really Hard Time They Had There, It Seems. They were Satanic, though, since they were polytheists (human kind's God is just one, Our God!)
From the video, we learned that Egyptians did lots of crazy and wrong things, not only the things we already know, such as Amen's Wife, polytheism, mumification, pyramid structure of power, power, claiming that Our God (since there is only one God for human kind) told them to be the commander of everyone else there, slavery, but also mumification of animals, perhaps based on adoration to those, and so on.
We believe the rate the fellow gave for literacy in Egypt correspond to the rate of literacy in what regards the official language, Egyptian, held by the negro satanic males, who took over the place via usurpation, so around 1%. That because he mentions they had quite a few temples where they instructed the locals on the official language plus those were temples, which means accessible to everyone in the population and still created for them to use and enjoy. We have to assume everyone in Egypt would attend its temples, since they were so religious the satanic report on the Amen-Ra ceremonies not having not even one person who wouldn't throw themselves over the cliff following the Amen's Wife having selected them for the human sacrifice. He says the temples all had hyeroglyphs and therefore those were written for the people to read what was in the writing, since the temples were built for them. In this case, most or all the people in Egypt were literate in what regards their official language instead.
That matches our impression about The Jews: that if they had followed Our Savior, Lord Jesus, as they claim, then they would have to be all iliterate, given how late the first writings were made in what regards reports on Our Lord's human life from back then, so circa year 0. We however believe there were no Jews whatsoever among Our Lord's people: that it was just Arabs, who were all white and scared the negros away. They were shrunk to the border of Arabia, where they first settled and the closest point to Africa where someone can live back then. They are still there, just that they called that area Israel. They managed to oppress and violate the Arabs so completely that they were reduced to a fraction of their lands and basically incarcerated in Saudi Arabia, where they would suffer every sort of atrocity after the negro successfully forced them to Islam and so on. They were probably exterminated and the so few writings that they had made, since we believe all Arabs were able to read and write, so writings about Our Lord Jesus, Our God and heavens, were destroyed by the negros through their compliance position usurpations or through their usurpations in general, when they then would usurp the existence of a follower and destroy their personal belongings, in them included the writings about Our Lord.
The negros apparently made the 'Persians' (so their Persians, when we then understand they usurped yet another group of visitors or conquerors, just like it was with the Romans) invade Egypt and followed that with 'Alexander' and others, when they then destroyed the culture of Egypt, including their official language, we now see.
Here we see the same 'titans duels' of the satanic everywhere: they play all roles, like, in our politics, of the USA or Australia, they are both the 'right' and the 'left' (Our God knows that they also invented this terminology, perhaps to mean it is the same heart and brain and one is their left arm when the other is their right arm, since they all would have to see themselves as parts of the institution, physical parts, what they could have transferred to the Christian churches, since we recently noticed they say, during the mass, that we are all part of the body of Jesus or Our God, something as atrocious as that, also blasphemious. We are definitely NOT part of the body of Our God or Our Jesus, but the satanic definitely ARE part of the machine that their institution is, so something like its right or left arm is acceptable image to describe their relationship to 'the thing'. Anyway, they obviously were all involved AGAIN, so both Alexander and the Persians. They actually definitely were also Ptolemy I Soter: Soter is Only To Have, since 'so' in Portuguese is 'only' and 'ter' is to have. That probably means they had already achieved all their objectives with taking over Egypt and were keeping position, so 'only to have'. Please guess the rest, so the Ptolemy.
ChatGPT: 'Greece did not impose their language on Egypt in the sense of forced cultural erasure, but Greek became a dominant language in Egypt during the Hellenistic period, particularly after Alexander the Great conquered Egypt in 332 BCE. Here's how and why that happened:
Historical Context:
332 BCE – Alexander the Great's Conquest: Alexander took control of Egypt from the Persians. He was welcomed as a liberator.
After Alexander’s death (323 BCE), one of his generals, Ptolemy I Soter, established the Ptolemaic Dynasty in Egypt, which lasted until the Roman conquest in 30 BCE.
Why Greek Became Dominant:
Political Control: The Ptolemies were of Macedonian Greek origin and ruled Egypt as a Greek monarchy. The ruling elite spoke Greek.
Administration and Governance: Greek was the official language of government, administration, military, and law under the Ptolemies.
Cultural Integration: The new rulers built Greek-style cities (most famously Alexandria), imported Greek institutions, and encouraged Greek immigration.
Multilingual Society: While Greek dominated in the elite and administrative spheres, native Egyptian (Demotic and later Coptic) continued to be spoken by the majority of the population.
Legacy:
Greek remained widely used even after the Roman conquest in 30 BCE.
It eventually merged with local traditions, influencing Coptic, the latest stage of the Egyptian language, which uses the Greek alphabet with some additional characters.
So, Greek became prominent in Egypt starting around 332 BCE, due to conquest and the establishment of Greek rule, rather than a harsh linguistic imposition.'
The presenter shows resentment in what regards the loss involved, so that he must care about learning what the Egyptians could possibly have written on those walls and objects. Yet he seems to give us a scientific way to tell when they disappeared from earth if we are right when we theorize they would have been one more civilization exterminated by the negro (negro, we have decided, means black African, we explained why in the last paper and in a blog post here but basically they said it) satanic males. When their language disappeared, so by the time of the last proper Egyptian writing we find through Archaelogy, they must have disappeared with it. If what he says is true, that happened before Christ came. Indeed, we are sure the 'George Hannah' we met at VUT in 2001, the one who claimed to have been born in Egypt, had nothing to do with their supposed culture and original people. We intiailly thought he and Asha (they seem to belong to the same subrace) were both from Rio but we ended up concluding they are also from Africa somewhere, as for genes/subrace involved. They were both fat. Talking here about their physical aspect from when we were interacting with the occuppiers of those IDs, so 2001, as for George Hannah, and 2002-2004, as for Asha Baliga. May Our God bless those who do what we ask immediately.
Comments
Post a Comment