Garrett Morgan: American Icon, Victim (Researcher)
Wikipedia says Garrett Morgan’s father was called Sydney Morgan and we can find absolutely nothing on Wikipedia about this man. It says he was an ex-slave whose father and ex-master was John Hunt Morgan (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hunt_Morgan). The story is obviously their insane invention and the General was a white native American man, a bit satanic, if he indeed supported slavery in any shape or form. He was someone who never even had thoughts involving intimacy with any other woman who be not his own wife, though, may Our Lord take good care of her soul in her path to heavens or in heavens. He was then usurped before the supposed son was born, so probably somewhere before or in 1857 (that is because Garrett would have been born in 1877 (Wikipedia) and his father would have been about at least 20 years old, we calculate, when he was born).
Wikipedia says, about John, after a wonderful career in the army, with promotions and all else: ‘On his return to Kentucky, he became a hemp manufacturer, and in 1848, he married Rebecca Gratz Bruce.’ ‘Morgan remained interested in the military. He raised a militia artillery company in 1852, but it was disbanded by the state legislature two years later.’ ‘Braganca’/the devil (I think I now have my memory accessible to me in the normal ways, since I remember that for real) talked about this company thing and that was already the usurper. However, we know that no native American white Christian man would leave a successful career in the military and start working in agriculture, specially producing hemp, so that his life got usurped before the supposed marriage, since the narrative is that he first became a hemp manufacturer. That means John Hunt Morgan lost his life in or before 1848, so at most at the age of 23 years old and ‘Rebecca’ was usurped as well before such a marriage, from which Garrett may have been born. The black African or black African descent satanic male murdered him and usurped, when the entire small family of John also got usurped, including his wife. The usurper procreated and the satanic brotherhood wanted to use the ID of the General to create a narrative through which people could believe the government of the USA was in favour of slavery, since the government was fighting in the opposite end, like they needed to say that at least part of the native American Christian people was in favour of slavery in order to portray America as the villain, which is what they do all the way through. Because the General was such a good army officer and Christian, the only way to make people believe that would be through a credible witness, which then would be ‘their’ Garrett, who would then say the General actually had slaves himself.
In Brazil, for the dictatorship to keep on going or even for it to start, the satanic brotherhood/sisterhood usurped quite a lot or manipulated things in several ways, perhaps applying the 'I am' trick. Perhaps if this man enslaved people, then he was already a whitened negro. The man on Wikipedia, top picture, is certainly not him: it is definitely a negro. The distance between the end of the chin and the top of the ear again proves that. This is yet another V-faced male, so Nubian. In September of 1861, ‘John’ did not join the army that was fighting to preserve slavery in the USA and was fighting against the Union, which obviously means the federal government, which definitely wanted to finish with slavery (the satanic brotherhood/sisterhood then created the civil war in the USA and all members of the force that opposed the Union must have been negros, perhaps painted in white. The purposes of such an atrocity would be at least three: spreading rhetoric to the own negro so that they would support their atrocities against America, exterminate as many Christian American native people as possible/replace them and create instability in the USA - the greatest Christian nation in the world - in order to guarantee everyone, including the USA, would be most defenceless as possible) instead: who joined the opposite forces to those of freedom was the black African or black African descent satanic man usurping John Hunt’s ID instead.
These negros then came from hell on earth, Nubia (or Rio, back then only Nubia), to make sure everywhere would be like Nubia, where they enslaved people, specially their own race. The life of our so priceless societal member, Christian white American native male, John Hunt Morgan, then got usurped OBVIOUSLY before such a dark, in all senses dark, date, so before September of 1861. Since the picture https://explorekyhistory.ky.gov/files/show/19 shows a white man, the negro could already change himself into white through the 666 back then. To prove the man in the last picture is a Nubian, not only a negro, notice the ears that protrude quite a lot and have the edge designed in a way that is only seen in the African subrace, those two equidistant curves, plus the shape of the face, which is, in this case, a UV-shape. Observe also the shoulders of the negro, going down low on both sides, something not seen in the American white Christian subrace, specially those in the armed forces. It is then expected that all three are Nubians in this picture. Indeed, the top one has the UV-face. As for the third one, perhaps the line going from the top of the ear to the middle of the chin will do. In this case, as we know, their entire small family got usurped, if not the rest of them, and they usually usurp them all, specially if they have contact with each other. In this case, Garrett may have been born negro, even though he would not be a biological son of the 'lines on another's biography' things. Indeed, the name Garrett is for surnames only in English tradition: it represents an occupation, which is spear wielder (https://www.etymonline.com/word/Garrett). We have seen this before in this same blog. The negro however, unaware of such conventions and having the spirit turned to hell instead of heavens, therefore working in the opposite direction to that of the Christians, doesn't do any research before choosing this surname and using it as a first name. The knowledge token belongs exclusively to the English people originally and the only way a thing that never cared about contemplating other humans, therefore never cared about studying in the ways of Socrates, can learn that is a human having contact with them and letting them know that, but that would demand contact of Christian nature with a Christian and, were that possible, they wouldn't be satanic, since only Christianity is rational and does indeed lead to heavens. Well, this all is just to say this one is definitely theirs even though the credits are ours, as said before, so that it is adequate that it remains with an anglo-saxon name on them on the special occasion of getting good credits. I shared house with a 'woman' called 'Trish Morgan' in 2002 in Santa Kilda East. That is then also a usurper who was usurping the same family, figuring as white, woman and native Australian person, also proper citizen, so figuring as someone who abides to our societal rules. This is obviously the sort of thing the negro would have used in Africa to 'radicalize' subjects - perhaps even in our society - since there is nuts for everything, like people who would believe their co-citizens were like that someday, so obviously those who oppose the spiritual direction of the nation they are in and don't go for Christianity. We, native American Christan whites, very joyfully created the United Nations and Human Rights, please. Please notice that the negro would have created this one more conflict for the purpose of exterminating as many native Americans as possible, to pass rethoric (that the negro is better than the white for humanity because whites, when given all money and power on earth, enslave blacks) and to create instability inside of the most powerful white Christian nation in the world, so that they could take over/perpetrate more easily. May Our God bless those who do what we ask immediately.
Comments
Post a Comment